22 December 2025 | Basic Income Research Group, UBI Lab Greater Manchester, UBI Lab Network & Common Sense Policy Group
This report analyses engagement with UK trade unions on Basic Income (BI). Unions ‘firefighting’ issues such as pay erosion, workplace disputes and job cuts lack time to engage with long-term transformative ideas such as BI, prioritising proposals they believe a Labour government might consider. They also believe policy change must stem from members. They identify 6 arguments against BI:
It is not economically feasible
It enhances scope for employer exploitation
It threatens trade union relevance
It could undermine other policies that unions do support, such as Universal Basic Services
It may undermine public sector jobs
It is subject to misconceptions among members
However, several areas of support for BI did emerge:
It protects against automation and AI
It strengthens workers’ bargaining power
It supports equality and social mobility
It re-opens an ambitious social vision
Unions emphasised several conditions that must be met before taking a definitive pro-BI stance:
Demonstration of economic, labour market and public service feasibility from large trials
A clear, credible and progressive funding model
Assurance against exploitation
Support from members to indicate institutional social feasibility
Government interest to indicate political feasibility
Importantly, greater Green New Deal engagement means that demonstrating BI’s ability to support a just transition could increase union support.